Cloud & Azure Architecture

shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
All services
The problem

Azure gives you two hundred services and zero opinions about which ones you need. Most teams end up with a landscape that grew by accident — subscriptions nobody owns, costs nobody can explain, and a "cloud-native" label on what's really a lift-and-shift with a bigger bill.

What I do

I design Azure systems around the load you actually have and the cost you can actually defend. Event-driven backends on Azure Functions and Service Bus. Data strategies on Cosmos DB — partition keys, indexing, and schema designed for real multi-tenant throughput, including Gremlin graph when the domain calls for it. Containerized workloads on AKS with observability that means something. And when the landscape itself is the problem, I clean it up: I once consolidated 25+ scattered subscriptions into a single enterprise-owned environment, with the cost, security, and reliability gains that followed.

How I do it

Right-sized, always. I'll design you a distributed, event-driven platform when the scaling and deployment pressures are real — and I'll talk you out of one when they aren't. The goal is a cloud footprint you understand, can afford, and can hand to your own team without a consultant on retainer to keep the lights on.

Real Talk

"Cloud-native" is not a checkbox you buy. If your system has one write path that matters and one team deploying it, a single well-built API on Azure will beat a microservices constellation on every metric you care about — cost, reliability, and how well you sleep. I'll tell you which one you actually are.

map
shape
shape